Facebook Says New Executive Order Would Only Lead To More Censorship

Earlier this week, president Trump passed an executive order seeking to limit Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act — a law that protects tech companies like Facebook from being held liable for what its users say on the platform. The move has been widely seen as an act of payback after Twitter began attaching fact-checking messages to president Trump’s tweets this week.

Of course, Facebook has strongly pushed back against the proposed measure, saying it will only encourage tech companies to implement stronger censorship policies and restrict free speech.

“We believe in protecting freedom of expression on our services, while protecting our community from harmful content,” Facebook said in response to the order. “Repealing or limiting section 230… will restrict more speech online, not less. By exposing companies to potential liability for everything that billions of people around the world say, this would penalize companies that choose to allow controversial speech and encourage platforms to censor anything that might offend anyone.”

It’s unlikely that this order will result in action against Facebook anytime soon, but it could drag the social media giant into many lengthy court battles. And that alone might be the intended punishment for the company.

Recommended Resources

bitdefender The Choice of Tech Experts Worldwide. Try 90 days free of Bitdefender 2020 and experience the highest level of digital safety.

PIAPrivate Internet Access is an award-winning, cost-effective VPN solution. The use of an anonymous and trusted VPN is essential to your online privacy, security and identity protection.

System Mechanic 14 – Make your computer run like new. Winner of 200+ Editor’s Choice awards!

Mark Zuckerberg Says Facebook Shouldn’t Be The “Arbiter Of Truth” Previous post Mark Zuckerberg Says Facebook Shouldn’t Be The “Arbiter Of Truth” Facebook Will Begin Verifying The Identities Of “High-Reach” Accounts Next post Facebook Will Begin Verifying The Identities Of “High-Reach” Accounts